This really is supposed to be the "head to" powder-or darn near to it- for almost any bottle-necked cartridge just one could handload. It is the muse for a great number of pet loads, but I haven't been satisfied with the outcome.

They are really precisely the same factor, but H4831 sc is Slice shorter so it's going to pack right into a situation less difficult then the traditional, and in some instances like our 7mm rem mag it will allow us to incorporate extra powder then just the normal H4831.

4gr of H4831sc and Federal 215 primers. I discovered this combo makes .5MOA teams with velocity about 3020fps away from a 26" barrel. I take advantage of this similar powder in my 300wm taking pictures 180gr products, so it's wonderful to acquire just one powder for both of those.

While using the 154 grain Hornady SP while in the 280, H4831 gave me superior teams and good velocity, but Rottweil R905 features a substantially increased velocity and delivers marginally improved accuracy. With Swift one hundred fifty grain Sciroccos in the 7mm RM, H4831SC gave exceptional accuracy and velocity, but RL22 was marginally greater. For that reason, in Just about every of those situations I went with An additional powder, but I would certainly hate to divest myself from the H4831.

Thornton, CO Provide of H4831SC is starting to dwindle down too so get what you would like for your personal new load I might counsel. May very well be all of practically nothing when they restock every thing Soon but All those powders are obtaining transport regulation concerns.

Apache Jct h4831 vs h4831sc Superior details, I have jars of both equally and often wondered if they might be reloaded Using the exact recipes need to I run out of 1 or another.

Nampa, Idaho In my expertise the sole actual variation is that the shortcut meters far better by way of reloading equipment. Once it's loaded theres no functional change. I have listened to the shortcut might have a tiny little bit a lot quicker burn off fee but it seems insignificant.

Im under the understanding I want to use h4831sc. I have go through that these powders are identical Other than the shorter grain size of your sc. Really should I even now be on the lookout for h4381sc?

Chances are you'll either: one) Continue and possess the firearm(s) detailed down below routinely faraway from your purchasing cart:

The 55grs is all that I shoot from my swift. Other manuals I think that they've got slowed down the swift to show that their rifles are improved. It bug the hell from me. I understand improved. This is exactly why I don't at any time toss out my older manuals. I do purchase new guide all the time to remain up on new chambers and there loading. I exploit this 39grs in summers @ 100+ levels without any challenges.

This is certainly an older thread, you may not get a response, and will be reviving an outdated thread. Remember to think about creating h4831sc a new thread.

Like Everybody claimed, the SC stands for “shorter Minimize” and is a bit easier to meter. Would make you problem why they would continue to make the typical one.

rayporter stated: i never ever found a distinction aside from the common is like rolling cordwood on to the the pan. Click to broaden...

I could stack em in a single gap but I wasn’t happy with the velocity. Right after months, I acquired lucky and caught some H1000 on-line and of course compensated h4831sc slightly more. The quite following week in a gun clearly show a man experienced an entire case of H1000 for $forty for each 1lb. I overlook just how much, but Using the H1000 I’m now pushing a 160gr about 3200 and it’s a moderate load.